IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00724747.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Case Study on Process Modelling -- Three Questions and Three Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Glassey

    (IDHEAP - Institut de hautes études en administration publique - Swiss Public Administration Network)

Abstract

In this case study we compare three process modelling techniques in order to find common concepts and to identify significant differences. We base this comparison around three general questions: - What are the objectives of the organisation? - Who is doing what with which resources? - How does the organisation work? The answers to the third of these questions ("how does the organisation work?") are quite similar for all three of the modelling techniques we examine here. The main differences, at the modelling level, appear when considering the answers to the first two.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Glassey, 2008. "A Case Study on Process Modelling -- Three Questions and Three Techniques," Post-Print hal-00724747, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00724747
    DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.004
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00724747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00724747/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Glassey, 2002. "A One-Stop Government Prototype Based on Use Cases and Scenarios," Post-Print hal-00466929, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hana Tomaskova & Martin Kopecky, 2020. "Specialization of Business Process Model and Notation Applications in Medicine—A Review," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-42, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00724747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.