IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00634308.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'application de la théorie des facilités essentielles dans la décision du Conseil de la concurrence Voyages-scnf.com : Une analyse économique

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Marty

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Julien Pillot

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In its decision n°09-D-06, the French Competition Agency fined SNCF and Expedia Inc. for several anticompetitive behaviours in the online journeys selling sector. As an implicit enforcement of the essential facilities doctrine, two notified complaints relative to a potential abuse of dominance sound particularly interesting. On the one hand, this article aims at analyzing if the decision is relevant and consistent with the French and European case-laws. On the second hand, we ponder the effectiveness of SNCF's commitments to match anticompetitive concerns and to create favorable conditions for the emergence of new players in the relevant market.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Marty & Julien Pillot, 2009. "L'application de la théorie des facilités essentielles dans la décision du Conseil de la concurrence Voyages-scnf.com : Une analyse économique," Post-Print hal-00634308, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00634308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00634308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.