IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00468552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economic and livelihood value of provisioning services of the Ga-Mampa wetland, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • O. Adekola

    (Environmental Systems Analysis Group - WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Sylvie Morardet

    (DZNE - University of Munich - DZNE - University of Munich)

  • R. de Groot

    (Environmental Systems Analysis Group - WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • F. Grelot

    (DZNE - University of Munich - DZNE - University of Munich)

Abstract

The size of the Ga-Mampa wetland (1 km2), in the Olifants River catchment in South Africa, was halved between 1996 and 2004. This jeopardizes the ecological integrity and influences the benefits people obtain from the wetland. This study therefore analysed the economic values of the provisioning services derived from the Ga-Mampa wetland and evaluated their contribution to the livelihoods of local stakeholders. Using a direct market valuation technique and based on a mix of data collection approaches that include questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, field observation and measurements and collection of market prices, we estimated the economic value of the main provisioning services provided by the wetland (collection of edible plants, crop production, livestock grazing, fishing, hunting, fuel-wood, reeds and sedge collection). The results show that the contribution of the wetland to the livelihoods of local community, estimated at an annual net financial value of $211 per household, far exceeds its annual cash income of $35 per household and is about half of the average monthly cash income from all income sources. Crop production contributes the highest gross and net financial value, whereas sedge collection yields the highest cash income. Most of the materials harvested from the wetland are used for household subsistence and are rarely sold. In addition to their economic and livelihood value, the wetland services are also essential to sustain the social and cultural responsibilities in gift giving to neighbours and relatives. The study concludes that the local people are highly dependent on the wetland ecosystem services in many ways but that current use exceeds sustainability levels, which jeopardizes their future livelihoods. We therefore recommend that the local stakeholders be supported in identifying alternative sources of livelihoods while simultaneously developing sustainable management strategies for small wetlands such as Ga-Mampa. In addition, other ecosystem services (regulating, supporting and cultural, including recreational benefits) provided by the wetland to local and downstream stakeholders need to be further studied and economically assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Adekola & Sylvie Morardet & R. de Groot & F. Grelot, 2008. "The economic and livelihood value of provisioning services of the Ga-Mampa wetland, South Africa," Post-Print hal-00468552, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00468552
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00468552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00468552/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nabahungu, N.L. & Visser, S.M., 2011. "Contribution of wetland agriculture to farmers' livelihood in Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 4-12.
    2. Andrea M. Juarez-Lucas & Kelly M. Kibler & Miho Ohara & Takahiro Sayama, 2016. "Benefits of flood-prone land use and the role of coping capacity, Candaba floodplains, Philippines," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2243-2264, December.
    3. Cumming, Tracey L. & Shackleton, Ross T. & Förster, Johannes & Dini, John & Khan, Ahmed & Gumula, Mpho & Kubiszewski, Ida, 2017. "Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: A case study of South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 253-260.
    4. McCartney, Matthew P. & Rebelo, Lisa-Maria & Senaratna Sellamuttu, Sonali & De Silva, Sanjiv, 2010. "Wetlands, agriculture and poverty reduction," IWMI Research Reports 113010, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Gladys Chigamba & Moses Limuwa & Emmanuel Kaunda, 2021. "Does Paying for Aquatic Resources Matter? A Case of an African Riverine Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00468552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.