Author
Listed:
- Charlotte Wieder
(G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Marie-Anne Le Dain
(G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Eric Blanco
(G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Abstract
This paper is in line with existing research works on innovative design. It aims at answering the following question: how to facilitate the valuation of the results from the function (I) by the NPD project, without to disturb the NPD project performance? This question was formulated after studying the RID model (Research Innovation Development) [1], and the articulation of the function (I) aiming at exploring new concept and knowledge, and the function (D) aiming at developing a product, by using existing knowledge. To answer this question, the RID model and the reason why the NPD project might be disturbed by the results from the function (I) are presented. Then, the paradigm of NPD agility is presented, as an answer to this question. After defining the capabilities of an agile NPD, as well as the agile practice areas to master to obtain an agile NPD, the maturity grid developed on this paradigm in collaboration with a consulting company, PCO Innovation is presented.
Suggested Citation
Charlotte Wieder & Marie-Anne Le Dain & Eric Blanco, 2009.
"Proposition of a maturity grid to assess NPD agility,"
Post-Print
hal-00381460, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00381460
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00381460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.