IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00279499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Division of labor and division of knowledge: Why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm

Author

Listed:
  • Markus C. Becker

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Patrick Cohendet

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)

  • Patrick Llerena

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This article considers the role and interrelation of the division of labor and the division of knowledge, and its relevance for knowledge-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. As is well known, Adam Smith focused on the effect of the division of labor, while Charles Babbage focused on the effect of the division of knowledge. We are not the first to argue that both are connected in a loop, the division of labor guiding the division of knowledge via learning by doing, and the division of knowledge, in turn, guiding the development of competences for accomplishing steps of the work process. In this article, our main argument is that even knowledge-based and evolutionary approaches to the theory of the firm have focused more on the Smithian than the Babbagian part of the loop. We argue that the impact of the division of knowledge should not be glossed over and perhaps be considered first. The reason is that in the division of knowledge cognition enters the picture and makes a difference, amongst other things on the division of labor. Taking the division of knowledge into account also helps cast light on such important issues as understanding the emergence of routines.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus C. Becker & Patrick Cohendet & Patrick Llerena, 2007. "Division of labor and division of knowledge: Why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm," Post-Print hal-00279499, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279499
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thierry BURGER-HELMCHEN & Claude GUITTARD, 2008. "Are Users The Next Entrepreneurs? A Case Study On The Video Game Industry," Working Papers of BETA 2008-14, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Llerena, 2008. "A case study of a creative start-up: governance, communities and knowledge management," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 125-146.
    3. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Claude Guittard, 2008. "Are users the next entrepreneurs ?," Post-Print hal-02189762, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.