IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00279441.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Twenty Years of Evaluation with the BETA Method : Some Insights on Current Collaborative ST&I Policy Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Bach

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mireille Matt

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

As the number and variety of forms of public actions supporting Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I hereafter) has increased, despite their reliance on ever-scarcer public financial resources since the 1980s, evaluation studies have multiplied. At the same time, this period has seen an increasing sophistication and refinement in analyses of the research and innovation processes, and the accompanying rationale for and tools of state intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Bach & Mireille Matt, 2005. "Twenty Years of Evaluation with the BETA Method : Some Insights on Current Collaborative ST&I Policy Issues," Post-Print hal-00279441, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279441
    DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26452-3_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurent Bach & Sandrine Wolff, 2017. "The BETA-EvaRIO impact evaluation method: towards a bridging approach?," Post-Print hal-02167827, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.