IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00270469.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Critiques de trois arguments justifiant les lois sur le financement de la vie politique

Author

Listed:
  • François Facchini

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Cet article soutient que les lois sur le financement de la vie politique en France sont fondées sur de mauvais arguments. Il soutient que la corruption ne s'explique pas par l'absence de lois sur le financement de la vie politique mais par la valeur des mandats(2), que les inégalités devant le succès électoral ne s'expliquent pas par le montant des dépenses de campagne mais par les résultats économiques des politiques publiques et le capital politique des candidats (3), et que l'action des groupes de pression ne remet pas en cause la sincérité du scrutin parce que le don ne doit pas simplement être pensé comme un acte d'investissement mais aussi comme un acte de consommation (4).

Suggested Citation

  • François Facchini, 2004. "Critiques de trois arguments justifiant les lois sur le financement de la vie politique," Post-Print hal-00270469, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00270469
    DOI: 10.3406/pomap.2004.2854
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00270469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00270469/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/pomap.2004.2854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. François, Abel & Méon, Pierre-Guillaume, 2021. "Politicians at higher levels of government are perceived as more corrupt," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00270469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.