IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00268889.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les dispositifs publics protègent-ils du déclassement ?

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Lizé

    (MATISSE - UMR 8595 - Modélisation Appliquée, Trajectoires Institutionnelles et Stratégies Socio-Économiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This research take an interest to the gap between employment and education of young people in the survey « Generation 98 » of Cereq. This research compare the positions of young people who are recruit on jobs with « classic » status and « subsidised » jobs. A lot of persons are downgrading because their level of education are superior to the level of job's qualification. However, this problems of downgrading are difficult to measure. A statistical method (match between qualifications and socio-economic group) is confronted with a subjective approach (the person interviewed feels downgraded or not). These different approaches suggest that downgrading is a important phenomenon, he is more strong in « classic » labour market than in the « subsidised »jobs. This fact testify to the strong selection of the employers. The hypothesis is that relegate positions are a problems of queue in the labour market and the « subsidised »jobs act on the competition for job.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Lizé, 2005. "Les dispositifs publics protègent-ils du déclassement ?," Post-Print hal-00268889, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00268889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00268889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.