IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00228802.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le Time-Driven ABC : la simplification de l'évaluation des coûts par le recours aux équivalents. Un essai de positionnement

Author

Listed:
  • O. de La Villarmois

    (LEM - Lille - Economie et Management - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Y. Levant

Abstract

(VF)Kaplan et Anderson, conscients des limites de la méthode ABC, en proposent une évolution:le Time Driven ABC (TDABC). Il fait partie des méthodes d’équivalence caractérisées par leur simplicité et leur faible coût d’utilisation. En effet, la principale contribution du TDABC est de n’utiliser qu’un seul inducteur de coûts, le temps. Un autre apport est la proposition d’une mesure de la sous-activité. Toutefois, non seulement l’imputation rationnelle n’est pas un concept nouveau mais encore, les résultats proposés doivent être considérés avec précaution. Une autre difficulté peut être soulevée:la précision de la mesure des temps sur laquelle repose la méthode. Malgré cela, le TDABC est un outil simple et peu onéreux à mettre en place et à utiliser. (VA)As Kaplan and Anderson were aware of the limits of the ABC method, they offered a developed version : the Time Driven ABC method (TDABC). This version is one of the equivalence methods characterised by their simplicity and low cost of use. Actually, the main contribution of the TDABC method is its use of only one cost inductor:time. The method is easy to set up. Furthermore, subactivity can be measured. However, rational imputation is not a new concept and the results should be studied with caution. Another difficulty should be emphasized:the precision of the time measure which the method relies on. In spite of this, the TDABC method is an easy, low cost tool to set up and use.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • O. de La Villarmois & Y. Levant, 2007. "Le Time-Driven ABC : la simplification de l'évaluation des coûts par le recours aux équivalents. Un essai de positionnement," Post-Print hal-00228802, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00228802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    2. Anderson, Shannon W. & Young, S. Mark, 1999. "The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 525-559, October.
    3. O. de La Villarmois & Y. Levant, 2005. "La mise en place et l'utilisation d'une méthode d'évaluation des coûts : le cas de la méthode UVA," Post-Print hal-00184524, HAL.
    4. Foster, George & Gupta, Mahendra, 1990. "Manufacturing overhead cost driver analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 309-337, January.
    5. Yves Levant & Olivier de La Villarmois, 2004. "Georges Perrin and the GP cost calculation method: the story of a failure," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 151-181.
    6. Armstrong, Peter, 2002. "The costs of activity-based management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 99-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant, 2007. "Comment garantir l’homogénéité globale dans la méthode UVA ? Deux études de cas," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(3), pages 43-73, September.
    2. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant & Charles Ducrocq, 2010. "Le Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC):un premier bilan à travers une étude de cas longitudinale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(1), pages 123-155., March.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1486 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Grégory Wegmann, 2011. "Le déploiement d'un pilotage stratégique des coûts dans les services informatiques de deux groupes internationaux : perspective instrumentale et analyse comparative," Post-Print hal-00624488, HAL.
    5. Nicolas Berland & Michel Gervais, 2008. "À quoi ont rêvé (et n’ont pas rêvé) les chercheurs en contrôle durant les dix dernières années? Dix ans de recherche en contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 109-148, June.
    6. Nicolas Petit & Charles Ducrocq, 2014. "Modelisation Des Couts D'Un Service De Transport Hospitalier En Tdabc," Post-Print hal-01899530, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    2. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    3. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    4. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant, 2007. "Comment garantir l’homogénéité globale dans la méthode UVA ? Deux études de cas," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(3), pages 43-73, September.
    5. Simon Alcouffe & Pierre Mévellec, 2012. "Analyse de la littérature sur l'ABC et proposition d'une taxinomie," Post-Print hal-00936600, HAL.
    6. Matejka, M. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B., 2000. "Organizational Design and Management Accounting Change," Discussion Paper 2000-61, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Ionel Bostan & Aliona Bîrcă & Viorel Țurcanu & Christiana Brigitte Sandu, 2018. "Systemic Approach to Management Control through Determining Factors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Alexander Himme, 2012. "Critical success factors of strategic cost reduction," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 183-210, December.
    9. Gregory Wegmann & Stephen Nozile, 2008. "The activity-based costing method developments: state-of-the art and case study," Working Papers CREGO 1080903, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    10. Lino Cinquini & Paolo Collini & Alessandro Marelli & Andrea Tenucci, 2015. "Change in the relevance of cost information and costing systems: evidence from two Italian surveys," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 557-587, August.
    11. Bertrand Masquefa & Pierre Teller, 2011. "The effects of uncertainty, trust, structure and resistance to change in the diffusion of management accounting innovations: an agent based modeling approach," Working Papers hal-00583488, HAL.
    12. Matejka, M. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B., 2000. "Organizational Design and Management Accounting Change," Other publications TiSEM 0c9d3756-e33d-43a3-9ba7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Schoute, M. & Wiersma, E., 2001. "The evaluation of management accounting innovations; some methodological issues," Serie Research Memoranda 009a, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Christian Nitzl & Dennis Hilgers & Bernhard Hirsch & David Lindermüller, 2020. "The Influence of the Organizational Structure, Environment, and Resource Provision on the Use of Accrual Accounting in Municipalities," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 271-298, April.
    15. Anne Fortin & Hamid Haffaf & Chantal Viger, 2007. "The Measurement of Success of Activity‐Based Costing and Its Determinants: A Study within Canadian Federal Government Organizations/L'évaluation Du Succès De La Comptabilité Par Activités Et Ses Déter," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 231-262, August.
    16. Ezekiel Oluwagbemiga OYEROGBA, 2015. "Management Accounting Practices in the Developing Economies: The Case of Nigeria Listed Companies," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2, pages 76-85, August.
    17. Carlos Manuel Ferreira Lima, 2011. "A aplicabilidade dos princípios do sistema de custeio por actividades numa Instituição de Ensino Superior," Teses, Monografias e Livros, Open Access International Journals, edition 1, number 004 edited by Samuel C A Pereira, February.
    18. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2012. "An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 430-439.
    19. David Emsley & Lai Hong Chung, 2010. "How Management Accountants' Cognitive Style and Role Involvement Combine to Affect the Effort Devoted to Initiating Change," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(3), pages 232-257, September.
    20. Matejka, M., 2002. "Management accounting in organizational design : Three Essays," Other publications TiSEM 05952255-000c-4215-b05b-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00228802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.