IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00156453.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equivalence scales reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • Udo Ebert
  • Patrick Moyes

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The paper proposes a new and normative approach for adjusting households' incomes in order to account for the heterogeneity of needs across income recipients when measuring inequality and welfare. We derive the implications for the structure of.-the adjustment method of two conditions concerned with the way the ranking of situations is modified by a change in the reference household type,and by more equally distributed living standards across households. Our results suggest that concern for greater equality in living standards, conflicts With the basic welfarist principle of symmetrical treatment of individuals that is at the core of the standard equivalence scale approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Udo Ebert & Patrick Moyes, 2003. "Equivalence scales reconsidered," Post-Print hal-00156453, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00156453
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00156453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.