IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gat/wpaper/2403.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Penser l’aide à la décision publique autrement. Amartya Sen et le débat sur l’information

Author

Listed:
  • Antoinette Baujard

    (Université Jean Monnet, 42 023 Saint-Etienne, France. GATE Lyon Saint-Etienne (UMR CNRS 5824))

Abstract

Sen nous invite à penser autrement l'aide des décisions publiques et l'évaluation des politiques publiques. Plutôt que de déduire mécaniquement une recommandation de l’agrégation de certaines informations réputées représenter l'utilité des individus et une recommandation, il montre l'importance du débat sur l’information. Il met en évidence la pertinence des informations subjectives et objectives, individuelles et collectives, les sentiments moraux des personnes et les énoncés scientifiques, en même temps que la nécessité de prendre au sérieux leurs limites. Une décision collective juste exige de combiner l’ensemble de ces informations, individuelles et collectives, subjectives et objectives dans le cadre d’un raisonnement public.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoinette Baujard, 2024. "Penser l’aide à la décision publique autrement. Amartya Sen et le débat sur l’information," Working Papers 2403, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
  • Handle: RePEc:gat:wpaper:2403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gate.cnrs.fr/RePEc/2024/2403.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gat:wpaper:2403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nelly Wirth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gateefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.