IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/nswair/125.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing the Value-Human Resource Management Relationship in New Zealand Organisations: Findings of a Cross-National Replication Study

Author

Listed:
  • Toulson, P.K.
  • Holt, J.
  • Campbell, N.D.

Abstract

The study replicates an Australian configuration study using organisations in New Zealand. The Survey of Organisational Values (SOV) was used to categorise organisations into one of four value types (Elite, Meritocratic, Collegial and Leadership). The Human Resources Practices Survey (HRPS) was used to determine organisations' human resource practice profile. The Australian confirmed hypotheses that certain organisation value types differ significantly in the way their HRM systems are configured, and that organisations sharing the same type are more similar in their HRM configurations than organisations from other types, were supported in the New Zealand study.

Suggested Citation

  • Toulson, P.K. & Holt, J. & Campbell, N.D., 1998. "Testing the Value-Human Resource Management Relationship in New Zealand Organisations: Findings of a Cross-National Replication Study," Papers 125, The University of New South Wales. Department of Industrial Relations..
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:nswair:125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MANAGEMENT ; HUMAN RESOURCES ; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:nswair:125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.