IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/minner/270.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Revealed Preference Implication of Weighted Utility Decisions Under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Park, I.U.

Abstract

In a novel formulation of revealed preference analysis, Green and Osband [8] show that for expected-utility maximizers, acts partition the state-simplex into linear polyhedral blocks. The question naturally arises whether this characterization distinguishes expected utility theory from non-expected utility theories. This paper investigates the weighted utility theory of Chew [2] and shows that the corresponding partition is systematically different from the expected utility theory: the boundaries of the partition blocks are quadratic rather than linear. This result contains useful empirical contents.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Park, I.U., 1993. "A Revealed Preference Implication of Weighted Utility Decisions Under Uncertainty," Papers 270, Minnesota - Center for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:minner:270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Green, Edward J. & Park, In-Uck, 1996. "Bayes contingent plans," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 225-236, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:minner:270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.