IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/caldec/96-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Democratic Class Struggle: A Survey Of Recent Results

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Roemer

Abstract

The Downsian model, in which candidates care only about winning elections and parties play no role, has been hegemonic in formal political theory for forty years. In the past fifteen years, various authors have worked with a model of electoral competition in which competing parties represent different interest groups. This paper reviews the author's work with the model of partisan/ideological parties. The principal selling points of the model are that, if ideological parties are uncertain about voter preferences, then electoral equilibrium consists in parties proposing different policies, and the probabilities of victory (in a two party model) being different from 0.5. Applications of the model to understanding the relationship of democracy to economic development, the presence of long political cycles, and the failure of the poor to expropriate the rich in democracies are presented. Finally, a model is proposed that unifies the Downsian and ideological perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Roemer, "undated". "The Democratic Class Struggle: A Survey Of Recent Results," Department of Economics 96-07, California Davis - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:96-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/working_papers/96-7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:96-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.