IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/prnote/1290143990.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding evidence use by decision-makers: Findings of an online survey

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Wei
  • Li, Taotao
  • Carmona, Natalia Estrada
  • Remans, Roseline
  • Whitney, Cory
  • Aynekulu, Ermias

Abstract

Lack of evidence to support decision-making constitutes one of the obstacles to effective and socially responsive development policies. Making evidence-based decisions in multi-objective policies or programs is dependent on access to and use of relevant and coherent evidence. However, many potential obstacles may compromise decision-makers’ access to and use of evidence. Our work aims to improve the way research supports policy and program decision-makers involved in landscape initiatives in achieving sustainability across environmental, social, and economic domains. We designed an online survey to assess barriers hampering access to evidence and to explore avenues to reduce these barriers. Here we report on the findings of the survey, outline barriers to use of evidence, and suggest ways to reduce or remove those barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Wei & Li, Taotao & Carmona, Natalia Estrada & Remans, Roseline & Whitney, Cory & Aynekulu, Ermias, 2021. "Understanding evidence use by decision-makers: Findings of an online survey," Project notes December 2021, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:prnote:1290143990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/134899/filename/135098.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:prnote:1290143990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.