IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/cgiarp/152224.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Take-up of cash loans vs. agricultural input loans: A pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Ambler, Kate
  • Balana, Bedru
  • Bloem, Jeffrey R.
  • Maruyama, Eduardo
  • Olanrewaju, Opeyemi

Abstract

Smallholder farmers must invest in agricultural inputs (i.e., seeds, chemicals, equipment, land, and labor) during the planting season before earning income from the sale of agricultural produce after harvest. Credit can help relax liquidity constraints. In rural Nigeria, access to credit is limited, especially formal credit from financial institutions. Less than a third of households in rural Nigeria report using credit and only two percent of rural households borrowed credit from formal financial institutions (EFInA 2020). The rest is borrowed informally from friends, family, or local money lenders. Credit can take many different forms. For example, credit can take the form of a cash loan, where funds are provided to a borrower to make an investment of any kind. Another common form of credit is when specific goods, for instance agricultural inputs, are provided in advance to a payment. In both cases, the borrower must pay back both the loan amount, and any interest incurred from the loan. We partnered with Crop2Cash, a digital financial technology startup company operating in Nigeria, to test take-up for these two forms of credit.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambler, Kate & Balana, Bedru & Bloem, Jeffrey R. & Maruyama, Eduardo & Olanrewaju, Opeyemi, 2024. "Take-up of cash loans vs. agricultural input loans: A pilot study," CGIAR Initative Publications Rethinking Food Markets, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:cgiarp:152224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstreams/79ff7447-473b-4564-aa6c-1da4a69ecf69/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smallholders; farm inputs; income; agriculture; credit; loans; Southern Africa; Western Africa; Nigeria;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:cgiarp:152224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.