IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ceaspb/145188t.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gendered farm work and decision-making: Quantitative evidence from Tajikistan [in Tajik]

Author

Listed:
  • Mardonova, Mohru
  • Lambrecht, Isabel
  • Mahrt, Kristi

Abstract

Quantitative data collected in August and September 2018 in 12 districts of Khatlon Province, called “The Assessment of Nutrition-Sensitive Value Chains in the FtF ZOI in Tajikistan†were employed to analyze gender differences in participation in crop production and marketing activities, and to understand the association between women’s employment and their decision-making power at home. The dataset contains general information on the households’ farm activities, and detailed information of production practices for households’ main horticultural crops (vegetables, fruits, melons and cucurbitae).

Suggested Citation

  • Mardonova, Mohru & Lambrecht, Isabel & Mahrt, Kristi, 2024. "Gendered farm work and decision-making: Quantitative evidence from Tajikistan [in Tajik]," Central Asia Policy Brief 12, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ceaspb:145188t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstreams/e53aedf8-7d96-4da0-9c51-48da368c6681/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tajikistan; Central Asia; Asia; nutrition; value chains; gender; crop production; marketing; women's empowerment; employment; decision making;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ceaspb:145188t. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.