IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/87565.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women Have Been Hit Hard by the Loss of Routine Jobs, Too

Author

Abstract

Technological change and globalization have caused a massive transformation in the U.S. economy. While creating new opportunities for many workers, these forces have eliminated millions of good-paying jobs, particularly routine jobs in the manufacturing sector. Indeed, a great deal of attention has focused on the consequences of the loss of blue-collar production jobs for prime‑age men. What is often overlooked, however, is that women have also been hit hard by the loss of routine jobs, particularly administrative support jobs—a type of routine work that has historically been largely performed by women. In this post, we show that the combined loss of production and administrative support jobs since 2000 is actually more than three times as large for prime-age women than prime-age men.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaison R. Abel & Richard Deitz, 2020. "Women Have Been Hit Hard by the Loss of Routine Jobs, Too," Liberty Street Economics 20200304a, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2020/03/women-have-been-hit-hard-by-the-loss-of-routine-jobs-too.html
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Routine jobs; automation;

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabriella Bucciarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.