IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/87179.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Getting More from the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey?

Author

Abstract

Every quarter, senior loan officers at selected large banks around the United States are asked by Fed economists how their standards for approving business loans changed compared with the quarter before. Of all the questions in the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (SLOOS), responses to that question about standards usually attract the most attention from the financial press and researchers. Relatively ignored by comparison are loan officers? reports on how they changed interest spreads, collateral requirements, and other terms on loans they are willing to approve. Lenders can clearly expand or contract credit by altering those terms even without changing their standards for approving loans, so we investigate whether the reports on loan terms collected in the SLOOS are also informative.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald P. Morgan & John Sporn, 2017. "Getting More from the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey?," Liberty Street Economics 20170222, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2017/02/getting-more-from-the-senior-loan-officer-opinion-survey-.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    credit standards; loan growth; loan terms; SLOOS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabriella Bucciarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.