IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/87007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bank Capital and Risk: Cautionary or Precautionary?

Author

Abstract

Do riskier banks have more capital? Banking companies with more equity capital are better protected against failure, all else equal, because they can absorb more losses before becoming insolvent. As a result, banks with riskier income and assets would hopefully choose to fund themselves with relatively more equity and less debt, giving them a larger equity cushion against potential losses. In this post, we use a top-down stress test model of the U.S. banking system?the Capital and Loss Assessment under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) model?to assess whether banks that are forecast to lose capital in a severe downturn do indeed have more capital, and how the relationship between capital and risk has evolved over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Beverly Hirtle & Anna Kovner & James Vickery, 2015. "Bank Capital and Risk: Cautionary or Precautionary?," Liberty Street Economics 20150202, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2015/02/bank-capital-and-risk-cautionary-or-precautionary.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank Capital; Stress Testing; Financial Stability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:87007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabriella Bucciarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.