IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedgfe/2017-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FinTech and Financial Innovation : Drivers and Depth

Author

Abstract

This paper answers two questions that help those analyzing FinTech understand its origins, growth, and potential to affect financial stability. First, it answers the question of why \"FinTech\" is happening right now. Many of the technologies that support FinTech innovations are not new, but financial institutions and entrepreneurs are only now applying them to financial products and services. Analysis of the supply and demand factors that drive \"traditional\" financial innovation reveals a confluence of factors driving a large quantity of innovation. Second, this paper answers the question of why FinTech is getting so much more attention than traditional innovation normally does. The answer to this question has to do with the 'depth' of innovation, a concept introduced in this paper. The deeper an innovation, the greater the ability of that innovation to transform financial services. The paper shows that many FinTech innovations are deep innovations and hence have a greater potential to change financial services. A greater potential to transform can also lead to a greater chance of affecting financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • John W. Schindler, 2017. "FinTech and Financial Innovation : Drivers and Depth," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-081, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2017-81
    DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2017.081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2017081pap.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17016/FEDS.2017.081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao, Ran & Su, Chi-Wei & Naqvi, Bushra & Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas, 2022. "Can Fintech development pave the way for a transition towards low-carbon economy: A global perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Md. Mahmudul Alam & Ala Eldin Awawdeh & Azim Izzuddin Bin Muhamad, 2021. "Using e-wallet for business process development: challenges and prospects in Malaysia," Post-Print hal-03538151, HAL.
    3. Chen, Xiaohui & Chen, Wen & Lu, Kongbiao, 2023. "Does an imbalance in the population gender ratio affect FinTech innovation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Treu, Johannes, 2022. "FinTech, General Purpose Technology und Wohlfahrt," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 5 (Juni 2022), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    5. Koranteng, Barbara & You, Kefei, 2024. "Fintech and financial stability: Evidence from spatial analysis for 25 countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Keliuotytė-Staniulėnienė Greta & Smolskytė Gintarė, 2019. "Possibilities for Financial Technology Sector Development and its Impact on Banking Sector Profitability in Lithuania," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 12-23, June.
    7. Cristina Sbîrneciu & Nicoleta-Valentina Florea, 2023. "An exploratory case study: Romania’s digital innovation opportunities due to rise of digital currencies," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 143-164, May.
    8. Treu, Johannes, 2023. "Finanzielle Allgemeinbildung, Finanzielle Inklusion, FinTech und SDG: Ein holistischer Rahmen," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 2 (April 2023), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    9. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:14:p:143-164 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FinTech; Financial innovation;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2017-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.