IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedbqu/98335.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scenario-based Quantile Connectedness of the U.S. Interbank Liquidity Risk Network

Author

Abstract

We characterize the U.S. interbank liquidity risk network based on a supervisory dataset, using a scenario-based quantile network connectedness approach. In terms of methodology, we consider a quantile vector autoregressive model with unobserved heterogeneity and propose a Bayesian nuclear norm estimation method. A common factor structure is employed to deal with unobserved heterogeneity that may exhibit endogeneity within the network. Then we develop a scenario-based quantile network connectedness framework by accommodating various economic scenarios, through a scenario-based moving average expression of the model where forecast error variance decomposition under a future pre-specified scenario is derived. The methodology is used to study the quantile-dependent liquidity risk network among large U.S. bank holding companies. The estimated quantile liquidity risk network connectedness measures could be useful for bank supervision and financial stability monitoring by providing leading indicators of the system-wide liquidity risk connectedness not only at the median but also at the tails or even under a pre-specified scenario. The measures also help identify systemically important banks and vulnerable banks in the liquidity risk transmission of the U.S. banking system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiro Ando & Jushan Bai & Lina Lu & Cindy M. Vojtech, 2024. "Scenario-based Quantile Connectedness of the U.S. Interbank Liquidity Risk Network," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers SRA 24-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:98335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/risk-and-policy-analysis/2024/scenario-based-quantile-connectedness-us-interbank-liquidity-risk-network.aspx
    File Function: Summary
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/2024/sra2402.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomohiro Ando & Jushan Bai, 2015. "Asset Pricing with a General Multifactor Structure," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 556-604.
    2. Ando, Tomohiro & Li, Kunpeng & Lu, Lina, 2023. "A spatial panel quantile model with unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 191-213.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Mikusheva, Anna, 2021. "Limit Theorems For Factor Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(5), pages 1034-1074, October.
    3. Alain-Philippe Fortin & Patrick Gagliardini & O. Scaillet, 2022. "Eigenvalue tests for the number of latent factors in short panels," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-81, Swiss Finance Institute.
    4. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen & Damian Kozbur, 2016. "Inference in High-Dimensional Panel Models With an Application to Gun Control," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 590-605, October.
    5. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ossola, Elisa & Scaillet, Olivier, 2019. "A diagnostic criterion for approximate factor structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 503-521.
    6. Bertrand Candelon & Jean-Baptiste Hasse & Quentin Lajaunie, 2021. "ESG-Washing in the Mutual Funds Industry? From Information Asymmetry to Regulation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Hasse, Jean-Baptiste & Lajaunie, Quentin, 2022. "Does the yield curve signal recessions? New evidence from an international panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.
    8. Sung Hoon Choi & Donggyu Kim, 2023. "Large Global Volatility Matrix Analysis Based on Observation Structural Information," Papers 2305.01464, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    9. Sung Hoon Choi & Donggyu Kim, 2022. "Large Volatility Matrix Analysis Using Global and National Factor Models," Papers 2208.12323, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    10. YAMAMOTO, Yohei & 山本, 庸平, 2015. "Asymptotic Inference for Common Factor Models in the Presence of Jumps," Discussion Papers 2015-05, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Camacho, Maximo & Lopez-Buenache, German, 2023. "Factor models for large and incomplete data sets with unknown group structure," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1205-1220.
    12. Choi, Sung Hoon & Kim, Donggyu, 2023. "Large volatility matrix analysis using global and national factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1917-1933.
    13. Okui, Ryo & Wang, Wendun, 2021. "Heterogeneous structural breaks in panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 447-473.
    14. Ando, Tomohiro & Bai, Jushan, 2015. "A simple new test for slope homogeneity in panel data models with interactive effects," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 112-117.
    15. Castagnetti, Carolina & Rossi, Eduardo & Trapani, Lorenzo, 2019. "A two-stage estimator for heterogeneous panel models with common factors," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 63-82.
    16. Levent Kutlu & Robin C. Sickles & Mike G. Tsionas & Emmanuel Mamatzakis, 2022. "Heterogeneous decision-making and market power: an application to Eurozone banks," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 3061-3092, December.
    17. Kim Dukpa & Kim Yunjung & Bak Yuhyeon, 2017. "Multi-level factor analysis of bond risk premia," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(5), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Alain-Philippe Fortin & Patrick Gagliardini & Olivier Scaillet, 2023. "Latent Factor Analysis in Short Panels," Papers 2306.14004, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    19. Yu Sheng & V. Eldon Ball & Kenneth Erickson & Carlos San Juan Mesonada, 2022. "Cross-country agricultural TFP convergence and capital deepening: evidence for induced innovation from 17 OECD countries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 185-202, December.
    20. Chao Yang & Yajun Zhao, 2023. "Supply chains and risk premia in Chinese stock market: A sorted‐portfolio approach," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 277-305, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nuclear norm; Bayesian analysis; scenario-based quantile connectedness; bank supervision; financial stability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:98335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.