IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedbqu/97930.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Managing Risk in Cards Portfolios: Risk Appetite and Limits

Author

Listed:
  • Tiffany Eder
  • Claire Labonne
  • Caitlin O'Loughlin
  • Krish Sharma

Abstract

We describe an important risk management tool at financial institutions, risk appetite frameworks. We observe those frameworks for credit cards portfolios at four large banks and analyze when and why banks adjust them. The risk appetite frameworks for these banks monitor 40 to 150 metrics. We focus on metrics related to outstanding balances of which we identified 79. Overall, we find that these frameworks are sticky. Most adjustments occur during scheduled annual reviews and are relatively limited. Limit breaches are rare. Thresholds are often changed the month after a breach or after the utilization rate crossed 90 percent, but most breaches imply risk mitigating measures such as tightening credit standards. Notably, managers’ reactions were even stickier in the pandemic period.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany Eder & Claire Labonne & Caitlin O'Loughlin & Krish Sharma, 2024. "Managing Risk in Cards Portfolios: Risk Appetite and Limits," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers 24-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:97930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/risk-and-policy-analysis/2024/managing-risk-in-cards-portfolios-risk-appetite-and-limits
    File Function: Summary
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/2024/sra2401.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Gontarek & Ruth Bender, 2019. "Examining risk governance practices in global financial institutions: the adoption of risk appetite statements," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 74-85, March.
    2. Baldan, Cinzia & Geretto, Enrico & Zen, Francesco, 2016. "A quantitative model to articulate the banking risk appetite framework," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 9(2), pages 175-196, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanley Chege & Gregory Wanyembi & Constantine Nyamboga, 2023. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices in Kenya," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 15-26, April.
    2. Safa Jallali & Faten Zoghlami, 2022. "Does risk governance mediate the impact of governance and risk management on banks’ performance? Evidence from a selected sample of Islamic banks," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 439-464, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banking supervision; risk management; risk limits; risk appetite framework; credit cards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:97930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.