IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdaeee/eee2017-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Observatorio de dependencia. Segundo Informe

Author

Listed:
  • Sergi Jiménez-Martín
  • Analía Viola

Abstract

En este segundo informe del Observatorio de la Dependencia repasamos las principales magnitudes del sistema (solicitudes, resoluciones, personas con derecho a prestación y beneficiarias con prestaciones) con datos más actualizados hasta junio 2017. Sigue siendo de gran preocupación el denominado “Limbo de la dependencia”, es decir, aquellos individuos que oficialmente se encuentran reconocidos como sujetos de derechos pero que todavía no han recibido ninguna prestación o subsidio. Entre diciembre 2015 y junio 2017 se observa una disminución del 20% en dicha cantidad de individuos (de 384.326 a 319.112) aunque las cifras distan considerablemente de los valores previos a diciembre 2015. Si bien el SAAD ha alcanzado un tamaño razonable, todavía persisten puntos débiles como la infrafinanciación de los servicios y prestaciones así como una visible disparidad entre regiones, reflejo de las diferencias en recursos y preferencias. En definitiva, lo que por ahora tenemos, especialmente después de los recortes (no solo monetarios), introducidos en 2012/2013 se podría calificar como dependencia low cost, de bajo coste y baja calidad.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Analía Viola, 2017. "Observatorio de dependencia. Segundo Informe," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2017-22, FEDEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaeee:eee2017-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/eee/eee2017-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pilar (P.) Garcia-Gomez & Helena M Hernandez-Pizarro & Guillem Lopez-Casasnovas & Joaquim Vidiella-Martin, 2019. "Unravelling Hidden Inequities in a Universal Public Long-Term Care System," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-011/V, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaeee:eee2017-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carmen Arias (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.fedea.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.