IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdaddt/2000-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Purchasing Power Parity and Spanish Provinces, 1940-1992

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Olloqui
  • Simón Sosvilla-Rivero

Abstract

In this paper we empirically assess the validity of the PPP hypothesis from a new point of view. Instead of examining international data, we analyse PPP for Spanish provinces, eliminating many factors frequently offered to explain the failure of PPP. To that end, we make use of annual CPI data covering the 1940-1992 period. We apply time series analysis that allows for the presence of breaks in the trend of that series. We examine all possible bilateral relationships between provincial CPIs, running 2,450 regressions and computing 7,450 statistical tests. Our results are very suggestive since the PPP hypothesis is rejected by the data, even though in our case potential factors explaining the failure of PPP do not apply. Indeed, using robust versions of traditional cointegration techniques, although we find long-run relationships between provincial CPIs in many cases, such relationships do not satisfy in general the restrictions imposed by the PPP. On the other hand, our results indicate long-run relationships for almost all bilateral combinations of provincial CPIs when structural breaks are taken into account, being such breaks statistically significant. In this way, we illustrate how the formal consideration of eventual structural breaks may be useful for a more correct specification of an econometric model. Nevertheless, even with structural breaks the restrictions implied by PPP do not hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Olloqui & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, "undated". "Purchasing Power Parity and Spanish Provinces, 1940-1992," Working Papers 2000-24, FEDEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2000-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2000/dt-2000-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2000-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carmen Arias (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.fedea.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.