IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2024_42.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Acceptability of Meat Tax and Subsidy Removal by Meat-Eaters: Insights from Five European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Kmetkova

    (Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic & Environment Centre, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Iva Zverinova

    (Environment Centre, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Milan Scasny

    (Environment Centre, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vojtech Maca

    (Environment Centre, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Governments worldwide are exploring policies aimed at promoting healthier and more sustainable dietary choices. This study examines the public acceptability of two promising yet controversial policy interventions: the introduction of a meat tax and the removal of meat subsidies. Drawing on existing literature about the impact of policies on food consumption, particularly meat, we analyze data from a multi-country survey conducted across five European countries. We employ ordered logistic models and cluster analysis to examine factors influencing respondents’ support for these policies. Our findings highlight the role of value-based, diet-related and socio-demographic factors. Notably, respondents from Spain, Portugal, and the UK showed significantly greater support for these meat policies compared to Latvians and Czechs. Age emerged as a key factor, indicating an increasing likelihood of support for both policies among younger individuals. Moreover, environmental and egoistic values were associated with increased odds of support, while security concerns and hedonic values had the opposite effect. Education, employment, or income did not emerge as significant predictors. Our study underscores the complexity of public opinions toward meat policies and provides valuable insights for policymakers seeking to design effective strategies to promote healthier and more sustainable dietary behaviours in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Kmetkova & Iva Zverinova & Milan Scasny & Vojtech Maca, 2024. "Acceptability of Meat Tax and Subsidy Removal by Meat-Eaters: Insights from Five European Countries," Working Papers IES 2024/42, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2024_42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/en/acceptability-meat-tax-and-subsidy-removal-meat-eaters-insights-five-european-countries
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    acceptability; clustering; meat policies; meat tax; meat subsidy removal; values;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C34 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Truncated and Censored Models; Switching Regression Models
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2024_42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.