IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eyd/cp2013/240.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Güney Gaz Koridoru: Yeni Enerji Düzeninde Avrupa Enerji Güvenliği, Rusya, Türkiye ve Güney Kafkasya Üzerine Oyun Teorik Uygulama

Author

Listed:
  • Vahap Taştan

    (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat, İstanbul)

Abstract

Güney Gaz Koridoru, Avrupa Birliği’nin enerji politikalarında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Alhaiji’ye (2007) göre, 1970’lerdeki petrol krizlerinin literatüre en büyük katkısı “Enerji Arzı Güvenliğidir”. Aynı çalışmada Enerji Güvenliği, batılı devletlerin kullandığı bir kavram olarak ifade edilmektedir. Avrupa Birliği’nin özellikle Rusya-Ukrayna krizinden sonra konuya bakış açısı değişmiştir. Ortadoğu’daki siyasi istikrarsızlık ortamı ve Rusya-Gazprom’un politikaları, Avrupa Birliği’ni güvenli enerji arzı arayışına itmiştir. Zira Avrupa Birliği Gazprom’un politikalarından son derece rahatsızdır. Ayrıca Avrupa’nın kullandığı gazın, Rusya’dan ithal edilen kısmının %30’u geçmesi Enerji Güvenliği açısından önemli bir tehdit unsurudur. Bu bağlamda Güney Gaz Koridoru, yeni ve güvenli arz kaynağı olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Türkiye ise “Yeni Enerji Düzeni’nde” transit ülke olarak artık masada yer almaktadır.Çalışma, Güney Gaz Koridoru’nun Yeni Enerji Düzeni’nde önemini “oyun teorik” çerçevede tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca Gazprom-Ukrayna krizi ve Güney Gaz Koridoruna karşı strateji olarak karşımıza çıkan Güney Akım’ın da varlığı farklı modeller çerçevesinde irdelenecektir.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahap Taştan, 2013. "Güney Gaz Koridoru: Yeni Enerji Düzeninde Avrupa Enerji Güvenliği, Rusya, Türkiye ve Güney Kafkasya Üzerine Oyun Teorik Uygulama," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 240, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:eyd:cp2013:240
    Note: [English Title] SOUTHERN GAS CORRIDOR: GAME THEORY IN THE NEW ENERGY ORDER, EUROPEAN ENERGY SECURITY, RUSSIA, TURKEY AND CAUCASUS [English Abstract] Southern Gas Corridor is a very important issue in energy policies of the European Union. According to Alhaiji (2007), the biggest contribution of the oil crises in 1970’s to the literature is “Energy Supply Security”. In Alhaiji’s paper, the term of Energy Security is defined as a term which is used by Western Countries. It should be said that European Union’s perspective on Energy Security has changed especially after the Russian-Ukrainian energy crisis. Political instability in the Middle East and energy strategies of Russia-Gazprom forced the European Union to seek new and secure energy suppliers. The European Union is highly disturbed by Gazprom’s policies. Moreover, the European Union imports more than 30% of its energy consumption and this is a serious threat in terms of energy security. In this sense, the Southern Gas Corridor becomes a new and secure energy supplier. In the “New Energy Order”, Turkey is a gamer as country of transit. The aim of this paper is to discuss the importance of Southern Gas Corridor in the New Energy Order within the framework of Game Theory. Moreover the crisis between Gazprom and Ukraine and the South Stream which is a counter-strategy against the Southern Gas Corridor will be discussed within the framework of different game theorical models. [English Keywords] Not available
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekonomikyaklasim.org/eyc2013/?download=Paper%20240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enerji; Doğalgaz; Arz Güvenliği; Rusya; Güney Kafkasya; Türkiye;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eyd:cp2013:240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ozan Eruygur (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomikyaklasim.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.