IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eub/wpaper/2018-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

About Ethics in Thinking of Great Philosophers

Author

Listed:
  • Dana SISEA

    (Faculty of Financial Management, Ecological University of Bucharest)

  • Valeria Arina Mircea

    (Faculty of Financial Management, Ecological University of Bucharest)

Abstract

Ethics, an integral part of philosophy, has evolved closely with philosophical doctrines, with the obvious general-specific relationship between philosophy and ethics. At all stages of the evolution of philosophy, beginning with antiquity, many philosophers were animated by the desire to build and consolidate their thinking in the form of doctrines, currents, concepts and philosophical guidelines, materialized, usually in works, many of them of recognized value over the centuries. The use of several concepts for defining and analyzing different philosophical thoughts (doctrine, conception, current, theory, philosophical orientation), is imposed by several factors associated with a philosophical thinking, such as: theoretical importance and Practice, degree of substantiation, resistance to critical positions of analysts, scientific authority of the exponent of a doctrine, concepts, currents, philosophical guidelines etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana SISEA & Valeria Arina Mircea, 2018. "About Ethics in Thinking of Great Philosophers," Working papers 06, Ecological University of Bucharest, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:eub:wpaper:2018-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ueb.ro/RePEc/eub/wpaper/eub-2018/2018-06.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ethics; moral values; reason; philosophical guidelines;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eub:wpaper:2018-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciprian Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ueb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.