IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/22009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Cautionary Note on Evaluating Subsidy Programs: Lessons from the subsidy program for SMEs in Japan (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • SAKASHITA Fumiyuki
  • SUMIYA Kazuhiko
  • INOUE Toshikatsu
  • HASHIMOTO Yuki

Abstract

This paper provides a cautionary note on evaluating subsidy programs. Using data on applicants, we analyze the subsidy program for SMEs in Japan (the “Monozukuri Subsidy†program). When evaluating subsidy programs, researchers often use causal-inference methods such as regression discontinuity design that compares recipients with scores slightly higher than the threshold to non-recipients with scores slightly lower than the threshold. If researchers fail to consider the possibility that non-recipients may receive subsidies from the same program in the future, they will underestimate its effects. We find that in the Monozukuri Subsidy program of FY2015, non-recipients near the threshold had a higher probability of receiving the subsidy in the future than recipients near the threshold. This result indicates that researchers should be aware of this point when evaluating subsidy programs. We discuss several ways to cope with this problem.

Suggested Citation

  • SAKASHITA Fumiyuki & SUMIYA Kazuhiko & INOUE Toshikatsu & HASHIMOTO Yuki, 2022. "A Cautionary Note on Evaluating Subsidy Programs: Lessons from the subsidy program for SMEs in Japan (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 22009, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/22p009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.