IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/20024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[WTO Case Review Series No.33] China – Domestic Support for Agricultural Producers (DS511): Calculation of Market Price Support (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • Takemasa SEKINE

Abstract

So far, only a limited number of disputes relating to "domestic support," a technical term used under the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) to describe the domestic subsidies for agricultural products, has been referred to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The reason for such can be attributed to the fact that most WTO Members were, for various reasons, able to comply with the reduction commitments made under the AoA. China was no exception. However, since around 2010, its market price support (MPS) began to gradually increase and eventually, the US decided to bring the case to the WTO when such price seemed to overshoot the level tolerable under the AoA. The significance of this case (DS511) is that the Panel decided to use the period of 1996-1998, which is listed in China's accession document (schedule), as a base period for the calculation of the fixed external reference price (FERP) in estimating the MPS. This conclusion, for newly acceded WTO Members, substantially signifies an amendment to the AoA under which the base period for the FERP is prescribed as 1986-1988. In addition to the substantial issues, the case also includes some important procedural matters such as the partial opening of the proceedings which may have some important implications on future disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Takemasa SEKINE, 2020. "[WTO Case Review Series No.33] China – Domestic Support for Agricultural Producers (DS511): Calculation of Market Price Support (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 20024, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:20024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/20p024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:20024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.