IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/16001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Reality of Diversified Employees: Evidence from a 2014 RIETI survey on diversified work styles of regular and non-regular workers (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • TSURU Kotaro
  • KUME Koichi
  • TODA Akihito

Abstract

Being confronted with the negative impact of a labor force shortage and a shift in the industrial structure, Japanese firms are trying to utilize diversified regular employees who are flexible in their work styles such as job duties, work location, or working hours. Regardless of the importance, however, the reality has not been elucidated. In this paper, we analyze a brand-new survey conducted by RIETI and present new evidence of the reality of diversified employees in terms of work style, recognition, transition system, termination of employment, and job satisfaction. We find that diversified employees 1) enjoy shorter working hours than employees who are not limited in work styles and 2) earn less income but are equally satisfied with their jobs as other employees. We also find that 3) employees with flexible working hours have more job satisfaction and 4) diversified employees are more involved with their supervision and feel accelerated growth in their jobs. These results suggest that the effectiveness of a diversified employee system depends not only on the labor contract on flexibility but also on the employment management in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • TSURU Kotaro & KUME Koichi & TODA Akihito, 2016. "The Reality of Diversified Employees: Evidence from a 2014 RIETI survey on diversified work styles of regular and non-regular workers (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 16001, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:16001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/16p001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:16001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.