IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/11015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[2010-2011 WTO Case Review Series No.4]Australia—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples from New Zealand (WT/DS367/R, WT/DS367/AB/R): Scope of the Obligations under Article 5.1 of the SPS Agreement on a scientific basis (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • NAIKI Yoshiko

Abstract

The Australia Apples case is the first case following the two well-known cases of Biotech and Hormones II. These two cases received greater attention due to high uncertainty and low scientific common ground on the risks. The Apples case, which addressed a less difficult matter of quarantine risk, was a test case in terms of showing how well the Panel and the Appellate Body understood the previous rulings, especially the Appellate Body's rulings in the Hormones II case, where the Appellate Body clarified the standard of review to the obligations under Article 5.1. In fact, the Apples case followed the guidance provided in the Hormones II case and applied the same standard of review. As expected, Australia lost the case, on the basis that measures taken by Australia on apples were not based on proper risk assessment as required by Article 5.1. In one sense, for panelists, the Apples case was an easier case, since there were less complex scientific issues, as facts and issues of this case, especially with respect to "fire blight disease," were almost same as those in the Japan Apples case, which was disputed in 2005. Thus, the panelists could refer to scientific knowledge that was established in the Japan Apples case. This leaves us with a question of whether Australia could have solved the issue by mutual agreement with New Zealand at any time before the establishment of the WTO panel. Also, one might wonder whether a previous WTO ruling has any impact on a future, potential WTO dispute, or whether it is by nature difficult to reach an early solution on an SPS dispute due to the presence of difficult domestic politics in defendants' countries.

Suggested Citation

  • NAIKI Yoshiko, 2011. "[2010-2011 WTO Case Review Series No.4]Australia—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples from New Zealand (WT/DS367/R, WT/DS367/AB/R): Scope of the Obligations under Article 5.1 of the SPS Agreem," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 11015, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:11015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/11p015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:11015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.