Author
Abstract
Since 2016, Japanese Government finalized regulatory reform of Electricity industry and liberalized the power generation and retail sales sector of Electricity for all market segment. So Electricity Policy related discussions are emerged to change its focus on rather establishment of Ancillary service market and market regulation, economic welfare improvement of Electricity transmission sector that remains regulated even after the legal de-bundling planned in 2020, than conventional Electricity demand and supply related discussion. This paper explains the improvement of Electricity Policy Impact Assessment Model developed by the author in 2016 enabling the estimation of stochastic Electricity and Ancillary service demand and supply at once by estimating scale and probability of Electricity demand fluctuation, uncertainty of renewable energy supply and accident of power generators from factual data for 24 hours by 10 domestic regions. And in addition to that, forecasting the future policy discussions on the Electricity transmission sector, the author improved the model enabling the estimation of regional Prefectural based Electricity and Ancillary service transmission currency and LMC; Local Marginal Cost of Electricity supply from Prefectural based Electricity demand statistics and detailed location of power generators. As a demonstration of the improved model, the author used factual data from 2016 to 2018 by various official statistics such as "Denki-Yoho" (Electricity Demand and Supply Forecast Report) provided by regional Electricity company and estimated demand, supply and equilibrium price for Kyushu region for 365 days and 24 hours, and converted the demand and supply into local currency flow style among the seven Kyushu Prefectures. This paper provides evidence for the usefulness of estimation and evaluation by the improved model such as checking potential problems of local Electricity and Ancillary service demand and supply, estimating LMC of Electricity and impact evaluation of construction of new transmission line and so on. Hereafter the author further plans to develop and improve the model such as expanding the coverage to all 47 Japanese Prefectures and so on, and expects contribution to the practical Electricity related policy impact analysis.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:19060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.