Author
Abstract
Government authority must always rest at the proper locations to respond to the changing times and the changing needs of citizens in a mature society. The division of roles between the public and private sectors, and within the public sector, must constantly be reviewed and clarified. This paper discusses desirable business methods and management structures from the perspective of the division of roles between the public and private sectors in public transportation. Specifically, after discussing the outline of public corporations (in Section 2), the paper examines (in Section 3) standards for the roles of public corporations from the perspective of having the government support and make the greatest possible use of private sector know-how. The paper proceeds to discuss (in Section 4) the governance of public corporations, and then focuses on Japan's public transportation (buses and subways), which provides a relatively unified range of services, to present the current state, impediments to improving efficiency, and effects of reforms. The paper then concludes with the following policy recommendations derived from these discussions. First is the need to reform the division of roles between the public and private sectors. The division of powers needs to be rectified using diverse contract methods to make the greatest possible use of private sector know-how while securing the public interest. However, external governance over both the public and private sectors is required to make these reforms feasible and sustainable. Second is the need to reform the division of roles between the central and local governments. Considering how the unclear division of roles within the public sector is hindering efforts to reform that between the public and private sectors, the division of roles between the central and local governments needs to be clarified. It is desirable that areas which should be under the purview of the central government be financed using a simple subsidy system, with clear standards for guaranteeing funding sources or other involvement; and that areas which should be under the purview of local governments be operated under self-financing by the local governments.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:06022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.