IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/24040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technology Transfer, Emissions Trading, and International Trade

Author

Listed:
  • ISHIKAWA Jota
  • KIYONO Kazuharu
  • YOMOGIDA Morihiro

Abstract

We explore the effects of international technology transfers on global warming and welfare in a two-country (home and foreign), two-good, general equilibrium model with Ricardian and Heckscher–Ohlin features. We consider a situation in which both countries enforce emissions trading, and the home country, which has superior technologies in both sectors, has a comparative advantage in less emissions-intensive goods under free trade. The home country benefits from technology transfers in the more emissions-intensive industry due to an improvement in its terms of trade. The foreign country can also gain because global greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) decrease. Technology transfer in the less emissions-intensive sector can lead to a more significant reduction in GHG emissions but may harm the home country. When free trade in emission permits and goods is allowed between countries, technology transfers in either sector will likely increase the emissions permit price without affecting global GHG emissions. An increase in the permit price negatively affects the welfare of the home country that imports permits from the foreign country. International emissions trading may reduce the incentive for technology transfers because there is no environmental benefit, and the permit price is higher.

Suggested Citation

  • ISHIKAWA Jota & KIYONO Kazuharu & YOMOGIDA Morihiro, 2024. "Technology Transfer, Emissions Trading, and International Trade," Discussion papers 24040, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/24e040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Brecher & Ehsan U. Choudhri, 1982. "Immiserizing Investment from Abroad: The Singer-Prebisch Thesis Reconsidered," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(1), pages 181-189.
    2. Kazuharu Kiyono & Jota Ishikawa, 2013. "Environmental Management Policy Under International Carbon Leakage," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 54(3), pages 1057-1083, August.
    3. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. & Brecher, Richard A., 1980. "National welfare in an open economy in the presence of foreign-owned factors of production," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 103-115, February.
    4. Peter Bohm, 1992. "Distributional Implications of Allowing International Trade in CO, Emission Quotas," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 107-114, January.
    5. Kazuharu Kiyono & Jota Ishikawa, 2013. "Environmental Management Policy Under International Carbon Leakage," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 54, pages 1057-1083, August.
    6. Helm, Carsten, 2003. "International emissions trading with endogenous allowance choices," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 2737-2747, December.
    7. Jota Ishikawa & Kazuharu Kiyono, 2006. "Greenhouse-Gas Emission Controls In An Open Economy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(2), pages 431-450, May.
    8. Ronald W. Jones, 1967. "International Capital Movements and the Theory of Tariffs and Trade," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 81(1), pages 1-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jota Ishikawa & Kazuharu Kiyono & Morihiro Yomogida, 2024. "Emissions Trading and International Trade," Contributions to Economics, in: Sugata Marjit & Biswajit Mandal (ed.), International Trade, Resource Mobility and Adjustments in a Changing World, chapter 0, pages 147-175, Springer.
    2. Haitao Cheng, 2023. "Consumption pollution and taxes with endogenous firm locations and different market sizes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(6), pages 1601-1632, December.
    3. Cheng, Haitao, 2024. "Domestic versus international emissions trading with capital mobility," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Jota Ishikawa & Toshihiro Okubo, 2017. "Greenhouse-Gas Emission Controls and Firm Locations in North–South Trade," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 637-660, August.
    5. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2019. "Bottom-up world climate policies: Preserving fossil fuel deposits vs. capping fuel consumption," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 993-1035, August.
    6. Kefu Lin & Rui Pan & Dao-Zhi Zeng, 2024. "Carbon tax vs. emission trading in a monopolistically competitive market with heterogeneous firms," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(2), pages 825-848, August.
    7. By Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2015. "Self-enforcing international environmental agreements and trade: taxes versus caps," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 897-917.
    8. Yu-Bong Lai, 2023. "Capital mobility and environmental policy: taxes versus TEP," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(2), pages 326-350, April.
    9. Grossman, Gene M., 1984. "The gains from international factor movements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 73-83, August.
    10. Blanchard, Emily J., 2010. "Reevaluating the role of trade agreements: Does investment globalization make the WTO obsolete?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 63-72, September.
    11. Özge Demiral & Mehmet Demiral & Emine Dilara Aktekin‐Gök, 2022. "Extra‐regional trade and consumption‐based carbon dioxide emissions in the European countries: Is there a carbon leakage?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1987-2001, December.
    12. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2018. "Income terms of trade and economic convergence: Evidence from Latin America," MPRA Paper 87598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Christis G. Tombazos & Xiaokai Yang & Dingsheng Zhang, 2005. "A Neo‐Heckscher–Ohlin Model of Trade with Endogenous Production Patterns," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(s1), pages 71-81, August.
    14. Emily J. Blanchard, 2009. "Trade taxes and international investment," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 882-899, August.
    15. Nikos Tsakiris & Panos Hatzipanayotou & Michael S. Michael, 2024. "Strategic capital taxation, tradable emission permits and global pollution," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 276-296, February.
    16. Anil Lal, 2001. "Goods and factors liberalization under increasing returns to scale," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 115-131.
    17. Ngo Van Long, 2014. "The Green Paradox in Open Economies," CESifo Working Paper Series 4639, CESifo.
    18. Ivan Trofimov, 2021. "Income terms of trade and economic convergence: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 41-67, June.
    19. Haitao CHENG & ISHIKAWA Jota, 2021. "Carbon Tax and Border Tax Adjustments with Technology and Location Choices," Discussion papers 21030, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    20. Sungwan Hong & Seung-Gyu Sim, 2018. "Inelastic Supply of Fossil Energy and Competing Environmental Regulatory Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.