IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/woswps/628571.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labour market consequences of a high school diploma

Author

Listed:
  • Deni Mazrekaj
  • Kristof De Witte
  • Sarah Vansteenkiste

Abstract

This article compares the labour market outcomes of high school dropouts to high school graduates who did not enroll into higher education, but immediately entered the labour market. Using parental educational background as an instrument on a rich administrative dataset in the Flemish Region of Belgium, we find no returns to a high school diploma on average. However, these results hide considerable heterogeneity by gender and educational track. While females and individuals in vocational education may benefit from a diploma, male graduates and students holding a general education diploma may even be worse off on the labour market than dropouts. We show that sectoral heterogeneity acts as an underlying mechanism in the returns to a high school diploma.

Suggested Citation

  • Deni Mazrekaj & Kristof De Witte & Sarah Vansteenkiste, 2018. "Labour market consequences of a high school diploma," Working Papers of Department of Work and Organisation Studies, Leuven 628571, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Work and Organisation Studies, Leuven.
    • Handle: RePEc:ete:woswps:628571
    Note: paper number DPS 18.09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/519949
    File Function: Accepted version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/512722
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fritz Schiltz & Kristof De Witte, 2022. "Sugar rush or sugar crash? Experimental evidence on the impact of sugary drinks in the classroom," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 215-232, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:woswps:628571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/research/wos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.