IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/msiper/742970.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation and Firm Value Revisited: Evidence from a DCF Valuation. Approach across the Entire Firm Size Spectrum

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Van Cutsem
  • Marleen Willekens
  • Koenraad Debackere

Abstract

In this study, we leverage the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation methodology to reexamine how innovation links to economic value estimates of firms, and how size moderates this relationship. As DCF valuation can be applied to a complete spectrum of firm sizes, ranging from small privately-held to large publicly-listed firms, our study provides more exhaustive evidence on the link between innovation and economic firm value across for all types of firms. This contrasts prior studies that typically draw inferences based on market valuations of publicly listed firms. We show that innovation is positively and statistically significantly related to the economic value in both large and small firms, and that firm size negatively moderates this link. Notably, innovation is more substantially linked to the economic value estimates of small firms than larger ones. These findings are robust to various controls, alternative operationalisations, including survey-reported innovation in the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), and a battery of robustness tests for the DCF valuation approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Van Cutsem & Marleen Willekens & Koenraad Debackere, 2024. "Innovation and Firm Value Revisited: Evidence from a DCF Valuation. Approach across the Entire Firm Size Spectrum," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 742970, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:msiper:742970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/763340
    File Function: Accepted version
    Download Restriction: KU Leuven intranet only, request a copy at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/742970
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:msiper:742970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/MSI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.