IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/msiper/700181.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the coordination of R&I policies: An evaluation approach combining expert assessment and automated content analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stijn Kelchtermans
  • Anabela M Santos

Abstract

There is a long-standing agreement among scholars that the involvement of multiple authorities and the use of diverse policy frames hinders the coordination between policies. This paper responds to recent calls for exploring new empirical methods to study horizontal policy coordination by using automated text analysis. A key contribution is that our approach allows generating a quantitative indicator of the semantic alignment between policies. In addition, we develop a framework that embeds the algorithmic analysis in the workflow of human experts and we offer several guidelines for future efforts to combine automated policy analysis with expert assessment. Empirically, we focus on the case study of Portugal and analyse the potential link between the measures of the Recovery and Resilience Plan, part of the Next Generation EU (2021-2026), and the innovation priorities of its Smart Specialisation Strategies (2021-2017).

Suggested Citation

  • Stijn Kelchtermans & Anabela M Santos, 2022. "Assessing the coordination of R&I policies: An evaluation approach combining expert assessment and automated content analysis," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 700181, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:msiper:700181
    Note: paper number MSI_2206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/673177
    File Function: Published version
    Download Restriction: KU Leuven intranet only, request a copy at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/700181
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:msiper:700181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/MSI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.