IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/ecoomp/670501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving the precision of subject assignment for disparity measurement in studies of interdisciplinary research

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Glänzel
  • Bart Thijs
  • Ying Huang

Abstract

Studies of interdisciplinarity research (IDR) poses severe challenges to bibliometricians. These challenges range from conceptualisation of IDR, over the definition of disciplines and the way of how research can be assigned to those, to finding the particular methods for quantifying and measuring the peculiarities of IDR. One of the key issues is the determination of granularity. This issue is twofold: The conceptional consideration should clarify the question the level at which IDR would be studied, namely as topic, subject or field interdisciplinarity, and this needs to be supported by quantitative results. The second key issue concerns the way of the assignment of the subjects that are integrated in the research, once the granularity level has been chosen. These two questions are tackled in the present paper, which is closely linked to further studies by the authors on the effect of similarity measurement approaches on indicators (Huang et al., 2021) and on different implementations of similarity for the measurement of disparity and variety (Thijs et al., 2021). The present study proposes a multiple-generation reference model and gives solutions for individual-document based subject assignment and the calculation of cognitive distances between disciplines needed for the determination of disparity measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Glänzel & Bart Thijs & Ying Huang, 2021. "Improving the precision of subject assignment for disparity measurement in studies of interdisciplinary research," Working Papers of ECOOM - Centre for Research and Development Monitoring 670501, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), ECOOM - Centre for Research and Development Monitoring.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:ecoomp:670501
    Note: paper number MSI_2104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/610046
    File Function: Published version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:ecoomp:670501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/centers/ecoom .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.