IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/ceswps/ces14.07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The axiomatic approach to the ranking of infinite streams

Author

Listed:
  • Luc LAUWERS

Abstract

The history of the axiomatic approach to the ranking of infinite streams starts with Koopmans’ (1960) characterization of the discounted utilitarian rule. This rule, however, meets Chichilnisky’s axiom of dictatorship of the present and puts future generations offside. Recently, Lauwers (2010a) and Zame (2007) have uncovered the impossibility to combine in a constructible way the requirements of equal treatment, sensitivity, and completeness. This contribution presents and discusses different axioms proposed to guide the ranking of infinite streams and the criteria they imply. The literature covered in this overview definitely points towards a set of meaningful alternatives to discounted utilitarianism.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc LAUWERS, 2014. "The axiomatic approach to the ranking of infinite streams," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven ces14.07, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    • Handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces14.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/445541/1/DPS1407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kitti, Mitri, 2018. "Sustainable social choice under risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 19-31.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces14.07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/Economics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.