IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/ceswps/609381.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Portfolio Analyses, Impact Assessment and Approaches to examining how Framework Programmes from FP5 to Horizon 2020 address Societal Challenge 2: Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry, Marine, Maritime and Inland Water Research and the Bioeconomy Expert Group Report, European Commission

Author

Listed:
  • Donal Murphy-Bokern
  • Katerina Moutou
  • Felice Addeo
  • Ruxanda Berlinschi
  • Daniel Neicu
  • Peter Teirlinck
  • Angela Delli Paoli
  • Sava Buncic
  • Miha Humar
  • Tiina Pursula

Abstract

Horizon 2020 invests in research, development, innovation and associated activities within three pillars, one of which addresses societal challenges. This report provides an account of investigations of how EU-funded projects in Framework Programmes running over two decades have served Societal Challenge 2 (SC2): Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy. The overall goal was to assess the impact of a large project portfolio related to SC2, including through the development of new approaches to programme assessment, also in the context of development of research and innovation strategy in Societal Challenge 2.

Suggested Citation

  • Donal Murphy-Bokern & Katerina Moutou & Felice Addeo & Ruxanda Berlinschi & Daniel Neicu & Peter Teirlinck & Angela Delli Paoli & Sava Buncic & Miha Humar & Tiina Pursula, 2017. "Portfolio Analyses, Impact Assessment and Approaches to examining how Framework Programmes from FP5 to Horizon 2020 address Societal Challenge 2: Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry, M," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 609381, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    • Handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:609381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/488999
    Download Restriction: KU Leuven intranet only, request a copy at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/609381
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:609381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/Economics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.