IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id6922.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender Wage Gap in the Last Ten Years: A Case Study of India

Author

Listed:
  • Nayni Gupta

Abstract

This paper examines changes in the gender wage gap in India between the years 1999-2000 and 2009-2010, and analyses its determinants. Results of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition reveal that in the last ten years, the gender wage gap has decreased from 58.9% to 52.1%. In 1999, 35.56% of this gap was explained by differences in human capital endowments and job characteristics between men and women, and 60.44% of the gap was unexplained, or purely a result of gender discrimination. However, in 2009, the explained component decreased to 25.53% and the unexplained component increased to 74.47%. These results indicate that even after controlling for various explanatory variables, there is a gender wage gap in India which favors men – and that more than half of this gap is unexplained. It also proves that while the explained gap has decreased, the unexplained gap has increased. These results have important implications for policy-makers in India in terms of increasing educational opportunities for women, reducing social discrimination, reforming data collection methodologies, as well as increasing post-implementation accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nayni Gupta, 2015. "Gender Wage Gap in the Last Ten Years: A Case Study of India," Working Papers id:6922, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:6922
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A20156513810_41.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=6922&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Gosse & Siva Ganesh, 2004. "The gender pay gap and the importance of job size: Evidence from the New Zealand public service," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 101-118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Genc, 2017. "Gender, Ethnicity, and Wages in New Zealand," EcoMod2017 10338, EcoMod.
    2. David Fergusson & Sheree J. Gibb, 2009. "Sources of the Gender Wage Gap in a New Zealand Birth Cohort," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 12(3), pages 281-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:6922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.