IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id3851.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foretelling the Mekong: Key Findings of the MRC’s Strategic Environmental Assessment on Mekong Mainstream Dams

Author

Listed:
  • International Rivers Network IRN

Abstract

With 11 large hydropower dams proposed to block the Lower Mekong River’s mainstream, the future of the river lies at a crossroads. To inform decision-making, in October 2010, the Mekong River Commission (MRC) published a Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) report that offers a critical appraisal of the dam plans. The report evaluates future economic benefits from power-generation against a wide-range of environmental costs and impacts to riverside communities and their local economies. As these dams threaten to irreversibly undermine the ecology of the Mekong River and will place at risk the livelihoods and food security of millions of people who depend upon the river’s resources, the main recommendation of the SEA report is that decisions on whether to proceed with the mainstream dams should be deferred for a period of ten years until further studies can be conducted to ensure that decision-makers are fully informed of the risks. With so much at stake, it is crucial that the Mekong region’s decision-makers endorse and adopt the SEA’s recommendations before it’s too late.URL:[http://www.internationalrivers.org/files/SEA%20Factsheet_Eng.pdf].

Suggested Citation

  • International Rivers Network IRN, 2011. "Foretelling the Mekong: Key Findings of the MRC’s Strategic Environmental Assessment on Mekong Mainstream Dams," Working Papers id:3851, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3851
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document12932011500.4535334.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=3851&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mekong; region; decision makers; security; people; dams; river resources; hydropower; lower mekong; environment assessment; plans; environemental costs; riverside; communities; local econmies; ecology; livelihoods; food security;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:3851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.