IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2196.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equity for Open-Access Journal Publishing

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart M. Shieber

Abstract

Open access journal publishing is currently at a systematic disadvantage relative to the traditional subscription-based journal publishing. A simple, cost effective remedy to this inequity is proposed that would put open access publishing on a path to become a sustainable, efficient system, allowing the two journal publishing systems to compete on a more level playing field.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart M. Shieber, 2009. "Equity for Open-Access Journal Publishing," Working Papers id:2196, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document13182009240.2681238.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Pinfield & Christine Middleton, 2016. "Researchers’ Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    2. Donald Taylor & Heather Morrison & Brian Owen & Kumiko Vézina & Andrew Waller, 2013. "Open Access Publishing in Canada: Current and Future Library and University Press Supports," Publications, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Stuart Lawson, 2015. "Fee Waivers for Open Access Journals," Publications, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Harley, Diane & Acord, Sophia Krzys, 2011. "Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt1xv148c8, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    journal; publishing; open access journal; sustainable; health care; industry; health care industry; inequity; infrastructure; business model; consumers; readers; insurance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.