IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methods used for Assessments in the Rachna Program

Author

Listed:
  • Rachna Program

Abstract

Over the life of RACHNA, three sets of population based surveys were conducted: 1. Program wide baseline and endline surveys for INHP-II and Chayan to assess program performance; 2.Rapid Assessments Surveys (RAPS) in a sample of one district, referred to as a panel district, in each of the INHP-II program states to study the effect of program processes on outcomes; 3. Two evaluation Research studies with a pre-test, post-test, , quasi-experimental evaluation design in two program states, Uttar Pradesh and Andra Pradesh, respectively, to test the effectiveness. This paper describes the methodology of these surveys, briefly compares the methods used in these surveys with other large scale surveys such as the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), the District Level Household Survey (DLHS)/Reproductive and Child Health Survey (RCH) and the Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES), and discusses methodological issues relevant to the analysis used in this series of working papers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachna Program, 2009. "Methods used for Assessments in the Rachna Program," Working Papers id:2117, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document1772009340.9642145.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.