IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id1203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Guidelines for the Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents: Developing a Public Health Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Correa

Abstract

This paper is intended to be a contribution towards the improvement of transparency and efficiency of patentability examination for pharmaceuticals inventions, particularly in developing countries. It proposes a set of general guidelines for the assessment of some of the common modalities of pharmaceutical patent claims, and suggests elements for the development of public health-sensitive guidelines for the evaluation and review of pharmaceutical patents at the national level. It examines the practices of some patent offices and suggests some mechanisms that may be adopted to incorporate public health perspectives in procedures for the granting of pharmaceutical patents.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Correa, 2007. "Guidelines for the Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents: Developing a Public Health Perspective," Working Papers id:1203, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document1239200700.4246332.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gehl Sampath, Padmashree, 2005. "Breaking the Fence: Can Patent Rights Deter Biomedical Innovation in “Technology Followers”?," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2005-10, United Nations University - INTECH.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Gil Abinader, 2020. "Pharmaceutical patent examination outcomes in the Dominican Republic," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 385-407, December.
    2. Amy Kapczynski & Chan Park & Bhaven Sampat, 2012. "Polymorphs and Prodrugs and Salts (Oh My!): An Empirical Analysis of “Secondary” Pharmaceutical Patents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Sampat, Bhaven N. & Shadlen, Kenneth C., 2017. "Secondary pharmaceutical patenting: A global perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 693-707.
    4. Burri, Mira & Serrano, Omar, 2016. "Making use of TRIPS flexibilities: Implementation and diffusion of compulsory licensing regimes in Brazil and India," Papers 960, World Trade Institute.
    5. Tom Deweerdt & Kristin Caltabiano & Paul Dargusch, 2022. "Original Research: How Will the TNFD Impact the Health Sector’s Nature-Risks Management?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    6. Enes Işık & Özgür Orhangazi, 2022. "Profitability and drug discovery," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 891-904.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meeta Dasgupta & R.K. Gupta & A. Sahay, 2011. "Linking Technological Innovation, Technology Strategy and Organizational Factors," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 257-277, June.
    2. Gehl Sampath, Padmashree, 2006. "Indian Pharma Within Global Reach?," MERIT Working Papers 2006-031, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Harishankar Jagadeesh & Subash Sasidharan, 2014. "Do Stronger IPR Regimes Influence R&D Efforts? Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 189-204, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.