IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id1105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tobacco Substitutes: Harm Reduction or Smokescreen?

Author

Listed:
  • PLoS Medicine

Abstract

Do papers on smokeless tobacco serve a legitimate public health interest? The editors are seeking opinions from the readers [Plos Medicine editorial].

Suggested Citation

  • PLoS Medicine, 2007. "Tobacco Substitutes: Harm Reduction or Smokescreen?," Working Papers id:1105, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1105
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document13172007214.863918E-03.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=1105&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bero, Lisa A. Ph.D. & Glantz, Stanton & Hong, Mi-Kyung, 2005. "The Limits of Competing Interest Disclosures," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9170d63n, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mamudu, Hadii M. & Hammond, Ross & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1690-1699, December.
    2. Bramoullé, Yann & Orset, Caroline, 2018. "Manufacturing doubt," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 119-133.
    3. George Loewenstein & Daylian M. Cain & Sunita Sah, 2011. "The Limits of Transparency: Pitfalls and Potential of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 423-428, May.
    4. Joel M. Moskowitz & Seung-Kwon Myung & Yoon-Jung Choi & Yun-Chul Hong, 2021. "Reply to Brzozek et al. Comment on “Choi et al. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17 , 8079”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-3, May.
    5. Hendy Abdoul & Christophe Perrey & Florence Tubach & Philippe Amiel & Isabelle Durand-Zaleski & Corinne Alberti, 2012. "Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.