IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esj/esridp/303.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Overeducation in the Japanese Labor Market:Evidence from the 2007 Employment Status Survey(in Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • HIRAO Tomotaka

Abstract

It is generally found that overeducated (undereducated) workers earn less (more) than their correctly placed colleagues and reported that the return to year of overeducation, though positive, is smaller than the return to year of required education. Overeducation (undereducation) refers to the mismatch wherein an individual has higher (lower) qualifications than that required for his/her current jobs. In sharp contrast to the lively debate on the economic effects of overeducation in the United States and other western countries, evidence from Japan on this issue is relatively scarce. In this paper, we analyze the effects of overeducation and undereducation on wages in the Japanese labor market. Our study uses the micro data of the 2007 Employment Status Survey gathered from a national sample of workers on educational attainments and present job; the survey was conducted in October 2007 by the Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs in Japan. This study found substantial overeducation penalties and undereducation bonuses, in line with previous researches. This suggests that the occupational structure of the Japanese labor market lacks the capacity to absorb the rising number of educated workers into traditional occupations. Thus, the empirical results of this study raise a number of important issues for Japanese educational and labor policy.

Suggested Citation

  • HIRAO Tomotaka, 2013. "Overeducation in the Japanese Labor Market:Evidence from the 2007 Employment Status Survey(in Japanese)," ESRI Discussion paper series 303, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/e_dis/e_dis303/e_dis303.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esj:esridp:303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: HORI nobuko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esrgvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.