IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/iserwp/2016-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Survey-based cross-country comparisons where countries vary in sample design: issues and solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn, Peter
  • Kaminska, Olena

Abstract

In multi-national surveys different countries usually implement different sample designs. When making estimates of differences between countries, analysts often fail to take sample design appropriately into account. This failure is sometimes because variables indicating stratification, clustering or weighting are unavailable, partially available, or in a form unsuitable for cross-national analysis. We demonstrate how complex sample design should be taken into account when estimating differences between countries and we provide practical guidance to analysts and to data producers. Using EU-SILC data for 19 countries, we evaluate the inverse mis-specification effect (imeff) that results from ignoring aspects of design. Our empirical findings illustrate the importance of incorporating appropriate sample design indicators in variance estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn, Peter & Kaminska, Olena, 2016. "Survey-based cross-country comparisons where countries vary in sample design: issues and solutions," ISER Working Paper Series 2016-09, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2016-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2016-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynn, Peter & Hader, Sabine & Gabler, Siegfried & Laaksonen, Seppo, 2004. "Methods for achieving equivalence of samples in cross-national surveys: the European Social Survey experience," ISER Working Paper Series 2004-09, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dolapo Adeyanju & John Mburu & Wainaina Gituro & Chepchumba Chumo & Djana Mignouna & Adebayo Ogunniyi & John Kehinde Akomolafe & Joseph Ejima, 2023. "Assessing food security among young farmers in Africa: evidence from Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Christopher S. Walter & Marie-Rachelle Narcisse & Jennifer L. Vincenzo & Pearl A. McElfish & Holly C. Felix, 2021. "Description of Variation in Age of Onset of Functional Limitations of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders Compared to Other Racial and Ethnic Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Stavros Poupakis & Francesco Salustri, 2024. "Asynchronous fieldwork in cross-country surveys: an application to physical activity," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 1303-1318, September.
    4. Álvaro Fuentes-Merlos & Domingo Orozco-Beltrán & Jose A. Quesada Rico & Raul Reina, 2021. "Quality-of-Life Determinants in People with Diabetes Mellitus in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Abdul Waheed & Qingyu Zhang, 2022. "Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 837-855, February.
    6. Ortmanns Verena, 2020. "Explaining Inconsistencies in the Education Distributions of Ten Cross-National Surveys – the Role of Methodological Survey Characteristics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 379-409, June.
    7. Peter Lynn & Alita Nandi & Violetta Parutis & Lucinda Platt, 2018. "Design and implementation of a high-quality probability sample of immigrants and ethnic minorities: Lessons learnt," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(21), pages 513-548.
    8. Ortmanns Verena, 2020. "Explaining Inconsistencies in the Education Distributions of Ten Cross-National Surveys – the Role of Methodological Survey Characteristics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 379-409, June.
    9. Levi, Sebastian & Goldberg, Matthew H., 2021. "Democracy influences climate change concern," SocArXiv 6vk9d, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Georgellis, Yannis & Tsitsianis, Nicholas & Yin, Ya Ping, 2009. "Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 42-51, February.
    2. Gail Pacheco & Thomas Lange, 2010. "Political participation and life satisfaction: a cross‐European analysis," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 686-702, August.
    3. Horst Stenger & Siegfried Gabler, 2007. "Optimal Strategies in 2-Stage Sampling," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 29-42, February.
    4. Lynn, Peter & Hader, Sabine & Gabler, Siegfried, 2005. "Design effects for multiple design samples," ISER Working Paper Series 2005-12, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    5. Richard J Shaw & Michaela Benzeval & Frank Popham, 2014. "To What Extent Do Financial Strain and Labour Force Status Explain Social Class Inequalities in Self-Rated Health? Analysis of 20 Countries in the European Social Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Carina Cornesse & Ulrich Krieger & Marie‐Lou Sohnius & Marina Fikel & Sabine Friedel & Tobias Rettig & Alexander Wenz & Sebastian Juhl & Roni Lehrer & Katja Möhring & Elias Naumann & Maximiliane Reife, 2022. "From German Internet Panel to Mannheim Corona Study: Adaptable probability‐based online panel infrastructures during the pandemic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 773-797, July.
    7. Valeria Donisi & Federico Tedeschi & Juan Luis Gonzalez-Caballero & Johanna Cresswell-Smith & Elvira Lara & Marta Miret & Anna K. Forsman & Kristian Wahlbeck & Francesco Amaddeo & Jorid Kalseth, 2021. "Is Mental Well-Being in the Oldest Old Different from That in Younger Age Groups? Exploring the Mental Well-Being of the Oldest-Old Population in Europe," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1693-1717, April.
    8. Thomas Lange, 2012. "Job satisfaction and self-employment: autonomy or personality?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 165-177, February.
    9. Nathalie Greenan & Edward Lorenz & Stephen Allan & Thomas Amossé & Daniele Archiburgi & Anthony Arundel & Eva Bejerot & Lutz Bellmann & Sophie Bressé & Adam Coutts & Peter Csizmadia & Peter Ester & Jo, 2010. "The MEADOW Guidelines," Post-Print halshs-01362486, HAL.
    10. Isidoropaolo Casteltrione & Magda Pieczka, 2018. "Mediating the contributions of Facebook to political participation in Italy and the UK: the role of media and political landscapes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Lynn, Peter & Gabler, Siegfried, 2004. "Approximations to b * in the prediction of design effects due to clustering," ISER Working Paper Series 2004-07, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Yannis Georgellis & Nicholas Tsitsianis & Ya Yin, 2009. "Personal Values as Mitigating Factors in the Link Between Income and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from the European Social Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 329-344, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2016-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.