IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/emodwp/em8-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Research note: the effect of different indexation scenarios on child poverty in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Valentinova Tasseva, Iva
  • De Agostini, Paola

Abstract

Using the tax-benefit microsimulation model EUROMOD and Family Resources Survey, we investigate what would have happened to child poverty in the UK in the periods 2010/11–2015/16 and 2015/16–2020/21 under a range of different indexation scenarios of children’s benefits. We find that between 2010/11 and 2015/16 both the relative and absolute child poverty rates would have been lower if children’s benefits were uprated by RPI or if the government had introduced the Child Tax Credit uprating package it promised in 2010. Uprating children’s benefits up to 2020/21 as announced by the government in the Autumn Financial Statement in 2014 would result in real benefit cuts and increase in child poverty. However, triple lock indexation of children’s benefits would sustain their real value and would reduce child poverty rates substantially.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentinova Tasseva, Iva & De Agostini, Paola, 2015. "Research note: the effect of different indexation scenarios on child poverty in the UK," EUROMOD Working Papers EM8/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:emodwp:em8-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/euromod/em8-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:emodwp:em8-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.